"The Efficacy of Active and Passive Investment Strategies in the Institutional and Mutual Fund Spheres" by Christopher R.E. Joye

Abstract
We provide an empirical investigation of the efficacy of active and passive investment strategies in the institutional and mutual fund spheres. The domestic equity mutual (i.e., retail) fund market is found to be in Grossman and Stiglitz (1980) style informational equilibrium. Controlling for asset-pricing anomalies, benchmark inefficiencies, model misspecification, and the effects of uninformed liquidity-motivated trade, the mean active participant earns pre-fee risk-adjusted excess returns; post fees, returns are commensurate with that of the market proxy. In the institutional (i.e., pension) fund universe, participants exhibit abnormal selectivity abilities on both a pre- and post-fees basis. These estimates of abnormal performance confound conventional interpretations of the efficient markets paradigm. Motivated by the search for an explanation as to generic comparative advantages manifest amongst active portfolio managers, we conjecture that the sophistication of heterogeneous investor clienteles exerts a deterministic influence on the abnormal performance realised by active participants.

» Click here to download complete document

 

"The Impact of Limit Order Anonymity on Liquidity: Evidence from Paris, Tokyo and Korea" by Vito Mollica, Alex Frino and Carole Comerton-Forde

Abstract
This paper examines the impact of broker anonymity on bid-ask spreads in order driven markets. Previous theoretical research predicts that limit order anonymity results in deeper and more liquid markets. This paper examines this proposition using three natural experiments provided by Euronext Paris, the Tokyo Stock Exchange and the Korea Stock Exchange. Euronext Paris and the Tokyo Stock Exchange removed broker identifiers from limit orders on April 23, 2001 and June 30, 2003, respectively. In contrast, the Korea Stock Exchange introduced broker identifiers for limit order books on October 25, 1999. The results provide evidence that altering limit order anonymity has an impact on liquidity. Consistent with expectations, liquidity is enhanced by increased anonymity and adversely affected by decreased anonymity.

» Click here to download complete document

 

"Price Behaviour Surrounding Block Purchases and Sales: Asymmetric or Bid-Ask Bias" by Vito Mollica, Alex Frino and Terry Walter

Abstract
This paper analyses price effects of block trades for the 30 stocks that comprise the Dow Jones Industrial Average for the period January 1993 to October 2001. Previous research shows prices revert following sales, but remain high after buys, creating an asymmetry between block purchases and sales. Extant literature has offered several conjectures as to the source of the asymmetry. We replicate the asymmetry documented in previous literature and provide a new conjecture as to its source, specifically bid-ask bias. Results show that purging block trade price effects of bid-ask bias produces symmetry in the behaviour of block trade price effects. This suggests research design issues are driving the asymmetry documented in previous literature, and that purchases are not more informative than sales.

» Click here to download complete document